Gulp.

”Danish Tax Minister Rasmus Stoklund emphasized the need for clearer rules to avoid **unfair** taxation under the current regime.” Unfair? So, in this scheme, you would be liable for unrealized gains tax. To pay, you need to sell some assets. Then, you would also pay tax for actual realized gains for those assets when you sell. Idiots.

Pour l'instant ils sont les seuls en Europe et puis les autres suivront compte tenu des niveaux de dettes tellement exponentielles que l'ensemble des États sont dans la même situation sans que l'ensemble citoyens en soit conscients sauf que ceux qui sont habitués à vivre dans la misère, absolue qui peuvent voisins, ou vivant des territoires laissés à leur compte... hélas 😖🤢

Indeed that's what's concerning, if you do push this through and it does generate revenue and people don't move in mass other countries might be inclined to follow, even if its a smaller base of people, it might also discourage ownership of the asset and keep people in the fiat system to rob them through inflation

Revenir au troc et à l'essentiel peut être une première étape sans oublier notre côté humaniste (solidarité, mais empathie,..) dans ce monde devenu si addict au consommerime dans lequel l'espère est devenu esclave de ses 6 créations lesquelles peuvent le sauver ou à le mener à sa perte ♐

Those who have KYC coins but have moved them to cold storage, have multiple addresses that can’t be proven to belong to the same person who purchased them on an exchange. The transactions may have gone to North Korea or anywhere. So the question is, do they assume ownership regardless, and tax according to the purchases *only*? If the coins remained on a KYC crypto exchange, they would have proof of ownership and then basis for their (absolutely unfair) taxation.

I think @Bird1984 🦜 is from Denmark

A @npub1mftv...rkl3 opportunity... View quoted note →

We're quite happy with @npub1mftv...rkl3 here nearby, you guys might want to check it out when it's still for fun more than a necessity. #bitcoin #p2p