"Transparency" is what systems offer when they want you calm, informed, and still stuck.
1) Transparency without exit = glass prison
If you can see everything but change nothing, transparency just upgrades the UI of your captivity.
- Bank shows you every fee and risk flag → you still have no alternative rails.
- Platform shows you every "community guideline" and strike → you still can't realistically move your audience.
- State shows you surveillance stats and oversight reports → you still can't opt out of the ID/payments stack.
You're no longer ignorant; you're powerless with full knowledge. That's not freedom; it's a glass prison.
2) Why systems love "transparency"
Legitimacy coating:
- "We publish dashboards, reports, APIs. We have nothing to hide".
- Looks like accountability; functions as reputation armor.
Pressure vent:
- Angry? Fine. Here's a dashboard, consultation, or public comment period.
- Your energy goes into reading and arguing about metrics, not building exits.
Better telemetry on you:
- Every "transparency portal" and "consent dashboard” is also a data intake channel.
- They watch what you click, what you complain about, which features keep you hooked.
They roll out reporting much faster than portability or decentralization. That tells you what it's really for.
3) Information is not power; options are power
Power = knowledge × credible alternatives.
If you know your bank is abusive, but:
- every other bank runs identical rails, and
- cash life is criminalized / impractical,
then your "informed consumer choice" is fiction.
Same with platforms:
- You know you're shadowbanned.
- Your data export is useless.
- Your followers can't find you elsewhere.
Without credible exit, transparency is theater.
Only when:
- exit is cheap, and
- re-entry elsewhere is practical,
does transparency start to matter — because you can use information to punish bad actors by leaving.
Once exit is real, transparency becomes a weapon for you. Without exit, it's just better lighting in the cell.
Real shifts come from changing defaults, budgets, and choke points — or from building parallel rails that make the old path economically irrational.
Login to reply
Replies (6)
You can only change things within your control, it makes sense to be the change you believe in.
In my article on "why prolonged Bear markets are no longer allowed" ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-prolonged-bear-markets-are-not ), I covered the possible solutions outside the system.
I'll give you a TL;DR version.
"Crises will be kept long-enough so that citizens ask their governments for a solution (knobs implementation), but not long-enough to birth alternatives outside the system."
Ideally, a tax revolt + a rejection of fiat slavery, but probably not realistic at scale.
(1) Medium-of-Exchange self-custody + (2) mesh comms + (3) mutual credit are the top three solutions outside the system the Controllers fear because they reduce legibility and raise switching costs back.
Some of the other solutions outside the system are:
- Off-grid energy & micro-grids,
- Food & logistics sovereignty,
- Parallel education & credentialing,
- Community mutual aid / gray insurance,
- Jurisdictional arbitrage & exit,
- Legal sanctuary tactics,
- Coordinated labor friction at choke-points.
The regime's crisis design is deliberate: short, sharp, subsidized, and synchronized — just enough pain to win consent for new knobs, never enough time to seed alternatives.
Most of these solutions outside the system become more realistic in a prolonged crisis.
Use a simple threshold model:
- Let D = duration of pain (weeks), P = perceived personal loss (jobs/savings), R = repression level (legal/financial risk).
- Adoption probability ~ f(D×P – R – F), where F = friction (UX, coordination, defaults).
- The Controllers tune R (sticks) and F (frictions) while adding C (carrots: subsidies, payment holidays) to keep D×P below the tipping point.
Implication:
- 2–8 week shocks + immediate backstops keep D×P < threshold → no mass switch to alternatives.
- >12–16 weeks, visible unfairness, and bungled backstops push D×P above threshold → outside systems scale.
- They plan to avoid the latter — revealed preference: fast facilities, forbearance, and "temporary" rules that ratchet.
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqvtw30knexxgwasss0qwafnz68hdx6u25xwpclsz4750ez46qpx2qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uqzpevy4q2ce55phhrvrl9qunjl7j5xd9tz0dx5wek59epw9jyjnfxmy8as5m
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqvtw30knexxgwasss0qwafnz68hdx6u25xwpclsz4750ez46qpx2qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qqswscncjz90k3supaagqgjypjvkm8sjru3uhn7x3q5a46e45svs4sgmy4uny
Mesh communication and decentralized internet. Are there any cool projects that you know of?
It's not something I've researched much. I'd look into LoRa/Wi-Fi mesh, fediverse with local relays, but can't endorse any specific projects.
Alright. I've heard of yggdrasil. https://yggdrasil-network.github.io/
We really need to start something for "non government controlled" internet access. Mesh networks are hard though.