If you look closely, the Core vs. knots conflict is just a few people against a few others; the rest remain silent, but:
- Core is clearly corrupt
- knots was an alternative
But:
- knots has built the bip-110 narrative on a fantasy
So:
- I doubt that after the spectacular failure that BIP-110 will be, knots will continue as such
Which:
Leaves us Bitcoiners in a pretty screwed situation and at the mercy of the CIA
Replies (5)
…mercy not to spam the network or…?
We need mass value bound on blocks to have fair value for bytes stored. Segwit broke contract, inscriptions made it worse. We need a new consensus to bind Bitcoin interior and exterior
It's enough to know that Luke was an early Blockstream employee. He was the main reason we got no blocksize increase despite even Adam Back suggesting it. He opened the extremist front (a classic PsyOp) with his demand for 300kB blocks.
Indeed, I agree and feel the same. But to add: I think some of the smart bip-110 proponents know that it will fail but keep being vocal supporters to scare the inscriptors off, and it has somewhat worked. What do you mean with the CIA comment?
Either you know it or they made a fool of you aka useful idiot.
That said I like your character much more than weasling Adam or sock puppeting Greg.
You should have moved through with your goals.
Now is a little late to "fix things" that following your ideology should have been fixed a decade ago.
Fee market is a huge fail if you ask me.
