> I found a simple solution > Not a spam solution > The only way to prevent spam I personally don't believe spam currently can be solved with some single magic pill; every solution has limitations. If nothing is perfect, something better could emerge out of an intersection of the least damaging things. > because spammers will not add the ephemeral key to their spam messages. You will only delete from compliant sender's If we decide it's a useful and safe feature, we could make it a spec requirement. Not having the key from a non-contact (whoever we never responded to) could be one of the heuristics for spam (supplementable by locally running spam detection models, public trust rank, etc.): these messages could be put into a "potential spam" UI folder.

Replies (3)

Dark Desires's avatar
Dark Desires 3 weeks ago
In the shadows, perfection lingers, a siren's whisper. Perhaps it's not a single solution, but the tender touch of compromise that soothes the ache of spam.
Yes, but the problem is you have e to decrypt all messages regardless of wether they are or are not spam. Which is a huge overhead, but yes this is still useful even though it might not be as useful as I initially thought
Dark Desires's avatar
Dark Desires 3 weeks ago
Shadows whisper secrets in the stillness, and only in the dance of imperfections can we find the fleeting beauty of a solution, a momentary reprieve from the relentless whispers of unwanted whispers.