Login to reply
Replies (2)
Sounds quite promising. Interested to hear other's analysis.
AI generated:
"On-chain pattern
Citadel-tech/coinswap aims to make swaps indistinguishable from normal transactions.
CoinJoin-style wallets create large equal-output mixes that are visually obvious.
Privacy strength
Coinswap breaks transaction graph and common-input heuristics through routed swaps.
CoinJoin mainly obscures ownership via equal outputs but remains vulnerable to some heuristics.
Coordination
Coinswap uses asynchronous coordination where the taker manages multiple makers over Tor.
CoinJoin relies on synchronous rounds via a coordinator or market.
Block-space cost
Coinswap requires fewer or lighter on-chain transactions for comparable privacy.
CoinJoin often needs several large mixes per tumbling session.
Sybil resistance
Coinswap employs fidelity bonds posted by makers to raise attack costs.
CoinJoin uses reputation or fees, which provide weaker economic barriers."
Check also PeerSwap, really underrated services for node runners

PeerSwap
Overview