Great Pontiff. Again, I have no expectation of privacy when sending personal information to a person, company, or otherwise. Regardless of the ramifications to said person or company, I would only be endangering my own anonymity.
Your personal annotations aside, protocols don't "do" anything. Social use is the "doing" part. If I run bitcoin on my local network, the protocol isn't "doing" anything. Nostr's social use determines what it protects or doesn't. Data availability is uncensorable only if YOU make sure to back up what you find important. Anonymity is only guaranteed if you don't doxx yourself to some corporate email.
But the last line is true, I DO wonder why no other relay operators seem to have the fortitude to publish takedown requests instead of silently removing users on their end.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Because it's a liability and a pain in the butt. That's really it.
Especially since a lot of those are probably related to CSAM and other very morally unsavory things.
I'm not saying you can't determine what you want on your relay. I'm saying you're the only one who can determine what you want on your relay. Legal and moral liabilities are not yours to determine for someone else (at least not enforcibly).