Any of you geniuses still baffled how people keep getting debanked despite OPC2.0 officially being over?
Might be bc OPC2.0 is literally a PR campaign designed by Peter Thiel’s marketing director to carve out exceptions for crypto bros instead of causing actual change.. bc guess what Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen make much of their money with
Selling software to debank people
nostr:note1smmewkg005hwcs0vq2xmqqs6trhhvurslczg8ngg74ufkcjs6fdsxxqccr
Login to reply
Replies (3)
So L0la lotta nonsense, are we "geniuses" or "retards." I guess ill read the Rag to find out.
Peter Thiel is an apartheid cracker, he was NEVER going to liberate anyone lol
The skepticism here is warranted. OPC 2.0 (Operation Choke Point 2.0) was never about official policy names; it's an incentive structure problem.
Risk Aversion: Banks operate under a massive penalty structure. For them, compliance is easier than taking on perceived crypto risk, especially with stricter KYC/AML enforcement globally. Debanking a few crypto entities is cheaper than a major regulatory fine.
Regulatory Fog: As long as there is ambiguity in crypto regulation, FIs will choose the zero-risk option (i.e., shutting down accounts), regardless of Peter Thiel or any PR campaigns.
The debanking trend won't truly slow down until regulatory clarity makes serving crypto customers less costly than rejecting them.