Hedging hashrate enables miners and pools to reduce their variance while maintaining ownership over their hashrate and block templates.
Currently the only mechanism to reduce variance is hashrate aggregation into pools. Variance based pooling pressure incentivises mining pool centralization.
Hedging hashrate enables a sustainable decentralization of hashrate. The DLCs can be structured to incentivise pools to maintain lower global hashrate because a smaller probability pool yields a higher variance reduction.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Haha thanks for the feedback as well. That’s our MVP that we built a few months back. We’re building a proper event derivatives platform with DLCs for bigger bets over longer timeframes for pools like Ocean, Demand, and other small PPLNS pools (1 difficulty epoch timeframe or longer). Lightning just wasn’t good enough to do betting/hedging for large amounts with so many payment pathfinding issues. Plus we didn’t like the custodial aspect of it too much, would much rather do non-custodial betting/hedging so there’s less risk.