Backwards compatibility with regard to forks is taken from the perspective of a node operator rather than a transactor, but yes. Perhaps a new term is necessary.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
> a new term is necessary
yes
so it's generally assumed this would be a hard fork (or whatever we call it)
and NOT just a new address type?
why?
because we have to burn the coins before they get stolen? 🤨
Wait what? .. new term . ???
Like semiSoftHardFORK 😭😭😭