Look, man.
If I’m wrong, explain — scientifically — how.
Two claims:
1. Shor needs one single, global, non-equilibrium, actively-corrected, constantly-measured quantum state at macroscopic scale.
That object has never been observed — not in nature, not in any lab, not once in 40 years.
2. Forty years of better isolation have already mapped the ceiling with brutal precision.
We’re hugging it, not raising it.
You keep answering with social proof and investor deck talking points. That’s not science. That's fait thinking.
People need sound money and strong walls. Our freedom, privacy and security are under very real digital theat.
I'm not throwing down our best weapons on a rumor from the enemy.
Show me proof that a a macroscopic non-equilibrium actively controlled constantly measured error-corrected universal quantum state
Is physically possible and I’ll eat my shoes on camera tomorrow.
Until then: don’t trust, verify.
Your move.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Open invitation. Anybody? Prove me wrong.
#asknostr #FUD #quantum
nostr:nevent1qqs070zmjrkqfws5gdhz3kup68ljkxmc4wwvkpy7u3wwpj7v0dae4mcpr9mhxue69uhkuurjdau8jtntwf5hxarpwpekktnvwcpzp3pk33gjuu8rv4v059nevlxh8lyr4z5s063ck0kksdv0e006krdxqvzqqqqqqysp0h3v
Let me clarify first, your view is that a quantum computer that can break a bitcoin key is, no matter how engineered, a physical impossibility, because the laws of physics say it is? As in this is not an engineering problem but a fundamental limit of physics, akin to faster than light travel in the conventional sense? That, with the knowledge we have today, we can conclude that, for now and for all time in the future, such a thing is totally impossible.
This is your view yes?