I don't wanna deal with Artix it's unstable I deal with enough bullshit from endeavour aaaaaaaaaaaa

christians and bitcoin maxis have things in common. they believe they are entitled to every square inch of epistemological reality. if you don't let them have all of it, they will claim you are oppressive, morally defective, misinformed. everything I don't like is satanic (a shitcoin) for made up circular reasons

cryptocurrency journalism be like "today something irrelevant happened in the world and this is why a rich person scratched their balls"

I lost brain cells listening to John Carvalho on @Vlad, Bitcoin Takeover Podcast 's show

wishing dylanmtaylor a very drink bleach immediately

bitcoiners are huge cucks now. everything is going to centralized lightning slop, ethereum is eating your lunch on fee revenue, and you lost the DNMs to monero years ago. you're only a few measly opcodes away from getting everything back on track but you'd rather jerk off in the cuck chair and have slapfights over irrelevant raspberry pi node settings. you have no plan.

lmao #boltz beta supports ethereum now

@Foxfire Mushrooms go away I'm not buying DEA contraband from you over social media I'm not 17 years old

you can tell who's a sellout when they celebrate any spark integrations. you can see em if you're driving.

hello activate CTV+CSFS vid unrelated

>bitcoin doesn't scale but it does... it scales naturally by letting excess traffic spill over into other chains. it is regrettable that this usually necessitates a new currency or a dodgy IOU, the trust assumptions get worse, and the new chain doesn't give transaction fee revenue to bitcoin miners. ethereum is the #1 bitcoin scaling solution, bigger than lightning, liquid, cashu, spark, and arkade combined. this benefits ethereum more than it benefits bitcoin. even spark benefits lightspark more than it benefits bitcoin. the users are the biggest losers here. you will be stuck with a cuckold chain for as long as you keep wasting time on lightning. the drivechain idea is more closely aligned with the way that bitcoin scales naturally. it's just a clever way to enable what is already happening to benefit bitcoin the most. I don't even care if it won't be called "drivechain" or if it uses covenant opcodes instead of hashrate escrows. the idea fits more neatly into observable reality.