App idea: a camera that automatically creates open timestamps of every photo and every minute of video. With any major event, "new footage" coming out hours or days later just can't be trusted without such solid proof. @Peter Todd

I just wanted to propose to zap @hzrd149 but then found it was their day three zap. Guess I'll have to zap them myself 🤔 View quoted note → I'm using noStrudel every day and can't wait for the improvements it still needs. And @hzrd149 would need so many more zaps to be able to hire a team but it's already miraculous how much they achieved with blossom, applesauce and noStrudel. So I tried to "Zap Split" with all the zaps for them but I'm not sure I did it right? Also how can I attach a zap to my message directly? If this is a "all goes to @hzrd149 split", I can now zap it but if not, ... I'll figure out how to zap with the right attribution.

@founders come to Lugano! Six more days to apply!

Google Docs

CypherTank Project Application Form

I'm not very familiar with that app but it sounds like an app that gets something local to the awareness of people nearby and now they got canceled on the App Store - censored if you will. How would a world look where doxxing apps and apps that call for violence against others - government officials or not - were readily available to anyone? Would we have lynch mobs killing random people because some anon "revealed" a pervert? Or would good people stop such witch hunts in their track? Assassination Politics comes to mind

Assassination Politics

View quoted note →

View quoted note → https://wikifreedia.xyz/ still works but @fiatjaf and others are undecided about switching the markup language once again. Can we get Larry Sanger, Co-founder of Wikipedia on board?

X (formerly Twitter)

Larry Sanger (@lsanger) on X

I am nailing Nine Theses to the door of @Wikipedia. This has been my project for the last nine months. There has never been a thoroughgoing Wikiped...

He's still too modest in his approach and thinks Wikipedia can be fixed from within but he's thinking about competing articles on any subject, too.

Hear me out, why don't we just use a spam filter proxy? The datacarriersize debate has people switching to Knots exposing themselves to thousands of poorly reviewed lines of opinionated code. Why not add a lightweight proxy in front of Core. - Filters datacarriersize, dust, standard scripts, fee rates - Rate limits per peer - Syncs block height every few blocks - Passes UTXO/mempool checks to Core Keep Core's well-reviewed consensus code. Add your own spam filtering without the baggage. Actually, policy rules that only need the transaction itself don't need to live in 500k lines of consensus-critical code. When #libConsensus?

Das klingt eher wie "SPD will sich selbst abschaffen" oder "SPD will Deutschland abschaffen" 😬 View quoted note →