freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­'s avatar
freemymind πŸ‡¨πŸ‡­
freemymind@NostrAddress.com
npub1kl8e...u2uq
#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence How to learn my philosophy: Start with some critical thinking on youtube with "TEDed the deomon of reason" miniseries Start with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read "happy" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it Follow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger On Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab Chronically offended by The Beave 😎
#asknostr My question goes to people, that claim "Taxes are theft" Do you belief every human being, no matter what race, nationality or age, should get the opportunity for good education? Since I totally agree to lower taxes on security expenses, which are easily targeted against the tax payer. I am unable to see, how it could be justified that a person, which is selfsustaining, could at the same time not participate in supporting education and on the other time profit from the merit of educated people. Independent if the person profits from services and products or scientific advances coming from educated people or the balance of power that stems from educated citizen. It is the natural result, that families with small children have got less economic power, than working adults without children. So where should the money come from to pay education of any form, when not from all of society? I am all open to have diverse programs of education, which compete with eachother. But I also highly support, that all people that make profit should participate in supporting this education. What is the alternative, when Taxes would be no option? Something like a Proton subscription? Where many people that can pay something, so there is a free plan, for those who can not afford it? Can such a system ensure, that every person gets a fair opportunity to educate their mind? I ask, since I often sympathize heavily with Anarchic systems. As many nostriches, I love the idea of sovereign individuals. But I see also, that education is effort. And good education needs didactic. Clearly some are more talented and might learn mostly by selfeducating. But many people need some kind of support. A person that helps, when someone does not find a good way to a solution.
To those reading the vague critique of @L0la L33tz against journalist and new nostrich @Masih Alinejad . I have been reading the critique. I have been reading about Masih Alinejad on Wikipedia. I read the mentioned article above. And yes probably it is true, that Masih Alinejad was funded by US-organizations. I have not seen any proof, that the CIA was involved in the funding. This seems a unprooven unsustainable claim. But first and formost I would argue, that a journalist is first and formost to be held accountable for her work. Are there any claims of her within articles, that can be prooven wrong? This seems the only question that matters. When she reports genuin and based on truth, I actually do not care, who is supporting her financially. View quoted note β†’
Lets throw away the idea to support rich people. Lets not support those. They can simply pay the support they need. Lets quit the imagination, that rich people are rich for their merit. Very rich are mostly where they are for the abuse of authority, theft and refusal to use their wealth for greater good. View quoted note β†’
More important than ever, to get up think for myself and stop to obey to a threat of violence. Since nobody has the power to enact a war, when there is no followers, that belief it to be for freedom or whatever other lies... View quoted note β†’
Really like tat they mention the difference between economic exchange and currency exchange. Money for a service or good offers an increase for both sides. The shopowner needs money and the client needs the apple he is buying. Both exchange a less valuable thing for a higher value thing from their perspective. But with currency exchang it is a zero sum game. Whoever gets the coin that increases in value, will win the trade. View quoted note β†’
Here I wrote a personal summary about Marko Passio’s 9-hour presentation about natural law. Whoever got the time, I can really encourage to listen to it too. But Marko also mentions a Book, which is named "The end of all Evil". So it can also be a good start into the topic, to read this. Only 32 short pages. It comes with heavy claims for a selfconsidering democrat (system not the party) as I am one. But to me it opened my eyes in a way, so I will never look on authority of any kind the same way again: https://blossom.primal.net/41088dd79b76e0ca0ef745dcc790a7afef7dcd89818d09d1749bde6ed3d661d5.pdf View quoted note β†’
↑