SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) is a failed metric.
Reducing SAR by 20% in a plastic dummy doesn’t prove you’re reducing oxidative stress, mitochondrial disruption or ion channel dysfunction in a real human body.
and if a device does show reduced SAR,
The real question is how?
Is it detuning the antenna, reflecting RF or altering impedance?
or does it cause the phone to work harder (increase transmit power), which could backfire & increase exposure in real life use?
I’d have more respect for companies if they were honest and said things like "may reduce EMF stress" or "supports resilience"
But if they claim a sticker or pendant “makes you safe”
It crosses into dangerous territory.
False sense of security is not protection.
And that’s not just misleading. It’s harmful.














