With payments, security, and antifragile systems, the idea of building everything in-house provides a paradox:
Everything being built in-house does not build trust; it actually removes trust and provides an opportunity for verification to be exploited at the expense of trust.
The world operates under third-party verification: supplements use NSF testing, car companies use external safety ratings, and airports require government IDs.
Examples are everywhere.
Verification is strongest when it comes from the outside, not internal trust-based systems.
Branta exists to prevent users from accidentally sending funds to fake addresses.
It’s an external reviewer for Bitcoin transactions—confirming whether an address is or isn’t the one you intend to send to.
No logins, no code injections, no added friction. Just independent, triangulated verification.
“Trusted third parties are security holes” only when trust is the basis.
Third-party verification operating outside the bounds of trust-filled systems makes your operations more antifragile.
Our latest on why you cannot verify yourself:
View article →
