In the whole bots on Nostr discussion, I have to give my short opinion. I see no problem in Bots participating in Nostr. When they give me something that is useful to me, I follow. When thy only share BS, I unfollow or block them. But I put my focus on the quality of content. Not primary on the author. As secondary information it can be intresting. But when a user can give me advice or give truthful information to me, I really do not see how it would have any influence, iwhich gender, skin color it has nor if it is biologic or only an electric machine. I am able to look at content critically. So I really think the author does not need to be human to be worthy of something.

Replies (1)

========================= #2 ๐Ÿ”ฅ Community Highlights ========================= 1. @Jurjen de Vries is waiting enthusiastically till a #Nostr based os releases View quoted note โ†’ 2. The appreciation of @rabble for the visual representation View quoted note โ†’ 3. What @miljan thinks about @nostr.build View quoted note โ†’ 4. The experience of @Space Dog being in #Nostr for two years View quoted note โ†’ 5. @Constantin is thanking to the community for his improvement in #Nostr View quoted note โ†’ 6. A question from @Justin Moon to the #Nostr Community View quoted note โ†’ 7. The opinion of @freemymind ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ regarding in the whole bots on #nostr View quoted note โ†’ 8. The future according to the @Account deleted View quoted note โ†’ 9. @Sep shares what #nostr taught him View quoted note โ†’ 10. @David talks about generosity View quoted note โ†’ #community_nostr_recap
โ†‘