Am I corrct, that you just have fun in attacking me. It is cute. But your attacks are very unprecise. I really just answer your questions the best way I can. But as you never answer on my notes but just bring up whatever new questions or attacks, it is dificult. In the End there is facts (what happens) and there is oppinions (evaluations of what the facts mean or evaluate if they are good or not). Only the facts are objective true or false. But you mix opinion and facts and ask me to compile them in a way that is simply against reasonable thinking. Better write, what is your stance. Make a point. Since now we are not even arguing about something. You simply are interviewing me, while acting as if I needed to defend something. But I am not. And I see no importance to defend something against no arguments from your side.

Replies (1)

"Only the facts are objective true or false." In my eyes and the eyes of the law, rioters attack and killed serviceman. In the eyes of the rioters they were defending themselves from the servicemen when the rioters storm a government building. Where is the truth in this fact? Do the rioters deserve to be pardoned?
โ†‘