rumble adding a self custody bitcoin and tether wallet seems like a big deal
Login to reply
Replies (48)
Ooh, need to get up to speed on this development
What networks does it run on? Is it using spark?
Anyone know what Rumbles cut is?
onchain only for now on the bitcoin side, should be interesting to see how they handle lightning support
For the tether though?
They only focused on Tether at Lugano
listening to the Rumble guy talk about it on a recent podcast was scary, though. He didn't know what Lightning was. and he didn't know the difference between Bitcoin and shitcoins.
This seems like a massive red flag. How do you roll out live payments on the internet and not use Lightning? (but immediately have Tether integrated....)
zero surprise
That's awesome 👌
OMG
We need to be psyopping.
We can undercut them and provide true censorship resistance. They can’t compete.
I suspect it’s on Liquid (BTC, USDT & Tether Gold support)
WDK doesn’t support Lightning?
FWIW its eth and polygon
Their FAQ does say Lightning support, so maybe it will be at launch
No liquid mentioned, which honestly i suspected — I dont think anyone is using liquid tbh
Interestingly, they also are supporting TON for XAUT which is Telegrams chain
I stand corrected. Spark for BTC makes sense here… lower fees.
They will use spark.money for lightning.
It looks like they are using spark FWIW
View quoted note →
Yes, they will use Spark:
Yes, on Spark.
I hope Tether will come to Spark so wallet devs don’t have to integrate 5 chains. lol
Probably Tether will mint on Spark too. And what about Stashpay, will you integrate Spark?
They have to be right?
💯
Sounds pretty cool.
Scary for him...
I think Spark has great trade-offs wrt UX and fees. But I’m kinda turned off by the public transaction explorer (I know it can be deactivated now, but why would anyone think that’s a good idea?). Also confidential transactions are only coming for tokens, not BTC. In general my impression is bitcoin privacy isn’t really a priority for Spark?
On most wallets is deactivated by standard and users doesn't even have option to enable it? So privacy is the standard.
But yes, everything has tradeoffs and I'm ok with the Spark ones. Good that we have options.
I'm using @Blitz Wallet for now.
View quoted note →
Qualquer ajuda é bem vinda irmão
why use BTC at all? tether is king 🙏
Thank god for the liquid network cutting through the criminal og bitcoin influencers. People who never got the free bitcoin fountain have no choice but to trade.
chamath met with paulo and sounds like he fully barred-up - as mentioned on this weeks hate-listen of all-in
Exactly what I thought when I listened to that interview.
Anyone given this a try yet? @Fountain could definately give Rumble some pointers
How do spark users verify that it’s now deactivated for their wallet (specifically in the case where they’ve created their wallet before the feature went live)?
Doxxing all user payments by default and later shipping an opt-out seems like a strange design decision. Some of the most knowledgable people in the wallet development space were surprised something like the public explorer even exists.
LN support coming soon according to Tether's Paolo
Hahaha sending USDT, looks like spewing 🤮
looks like they plan to use spark for that
Spark because it enables surveillance?
If they spend a few hours they can just integrate nostr and have lightning enabled immediately. Idiots.
Odell can't you get Jack to just get them to enable nostr/zaps? Whoever is advising Rumble or whoever is their product manager is really fucking them in the ass.
Paypal mafia
That's up to Rumble I suppose
Ah well, that's probably better than being custodial
Yup
the most important is to keep limited supply or ciculation 21.000.000 btc as satoshi intended . Once some group try to added more to the market based on the demand-supply , it will tip off the healthy balanced . Imo . When big whales put more liquidity to the market then it already violates what satoshi intended and you will see the price keep dipping ..but yeah ….the irony and dillemma