Thread

There's always risks I suppose. But increasing the amount of non-money data on the block chain does seem to increase that risk, logically. I'm not sure what the benefits of doing that are? And it seems weird that speaking of risk is framed as an implied threat. I speak of risks all the time and don't mean any threat by them, it's just an important part of risk mitigation. 🤷‍♀️

I don't know enough about him to call him an authoritarian. I was annoyed with him saying that disobedience is a sin, then annoyed again when another catholic said the same, but incorrect theology doesn't make a person authoritarian in other categories. I still haven't seen enough to retract the standard benefit of the doubt.

The more you learn the less you will like. He believes that law is morality, so yes an authoritarian. He isn't a Catholic he is some weird tiny offshoot of Catholicism. I really hope this "committee that can roll back the chain" shit breaks the spell so I stop being the only person who sees that core and knots are both attacking bitcoin.