I'm not sure you got the point being pushed.
nostr:nevent1qqsptfhdya5rg2jp5fxru03ryj0t6dmlsn90pk5tg6guwjx2aa57tasppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qgsgdp0taan9xwxadyc79nxl8svanu895yr8eyv0ytnss8p9tru047qrqsqqqqqpaltdnd
nostr:nevent1qqstkqgthwdd03sa8smut37mrgsr0zaumhftg5tv49h3ux64wf9p63qpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuvrcvd5xzapwvdhk6tczyr3zvzn67vanhgcqwsg3c3t8j080trf2ks79jedahdj4ly8ewwv6cqcyqqqqqqg3tftsq
Login to reply
Replies (2)
these are all straw man arguments
Argument: "if you want an opinion you need to fund core devs directly"
Counter: "a lot of us donate to core devs, & we are the lifeblood of the protocol maybe our feedback is valuable"
"If our voices are not heard maybe we'll be forced to redirect our efforts"
There's nothing wrong with my perspective.
There's nothing wrong with adversarial conversations.