Replies (12)

The fact that your government are corrupt and violent is not justification for violence against citizens. Just saying
kyle-moore's avatar
kyle-moore 3 months ago
No its not but doesnt mean that it wont happen
kyle-moore's avatar
kyle-moore 3 months ago
Dont want my daughter doing that was my point
I don't advocate for violence against anyone. This particular note was a shit post. My personal politics is atheist anarchy max personal freedom.
Don't misunderstand me. I have no affiliation with a group or individuals who may call themselves "antifa" (which isn't even a organization as a lot of people seem to believe) but I am against fascism. By definition fascists attempt to control others through violence or threat of violence. I don't agree with any of that and promote maximum personal and individual freedom from society, corporations, and governments.
Nope Noperson's avatar
Nope Noperson 3 months ago
I think most people would be against fascism, as you defined it, here. Unfortunately, leftist have weaponized language and muddied the waters on purpose. They say they are against fascism knowing that people will agree on the surface. But, then apply the term to people who are clearly not fascists in order to target them with violence and gain support in doing so. The same can be said for similar dehumanizing and evocative terms like nazi and racist. Antifa says they are against fascism, but by your definition they are fascist themselves, as they attempt to control others by violence or threats thererof. Antifa is what most people think of when people say anti fascist as they dominate the narrative. Using their imagery and language without significant clarification is going to encourage others to group you in with them.