lol, you were learning? seemed more like you were trying to punch a hole in her reputation because of her tendency to type the first thing that comes to her mind i agree that her understanding is weak in some areas and i also understand the process by which she learns through argumentation, mainly because i do a lot of this myself, but i am also very good at inference, many things i figure out even though i never actually read a strict definition of something, i just saw it used so many times in a context that i cemented my understanding based on this and it has been right like 7 times out of 10, in most cases, thus my brazen confidence at typing words

To some degree you're right. She writes a lot of long and confident pieces (that don't come off as stream of consciousness experiments) and posts them to the public for consideration. One form of reply you'll get when you do that is people saying "I don't think you're right about that, and here's why." Muting them and calling them assholes is an interesting style of replying to feedback on your content. I didn't drop a single snarky, rude comment and disappear. I had several long threads with her where we strongly disagreed and I hoped would eventually come to some kind of understanding at least of each other if not the world. I suppose that happened? She's left with an understanding that I'm some sort of sociopath. And I'm left with an understanding that she's deeply uncomfortable with long-winded disagreements. Uncomfortable enough that _she doesn't even want to see it in her client_...

LOL I spent almost an entire afternoon debating you and didn't get upset until you claimed religion addled my brain and you be like, She refuses to even respond! 🥴

Where did I say religion addled your brain? "Addled" has a negative charge. Wouldn't you agree that someone with strong religious beliefs has different worldviews when it comes to all sorts of topics than those without any religious belief? (It wouldn't be much of a belief if it didn't change your mind, right?) You don't have to use the derogatory term "addled". I am indeed curious where your worldview and mine diverge, and when that divergence stems from our differing metaphysical beliefs. That's not an insulting or trolly disposition is it? For instance, I asked what you consider the term "greed" to mean, elsewhere in the threads. I'd wager we have different ideas there due to our belief systems. There was nothing rude or baiting or inciteful about that question. Of course it's your prerogative if you choose to answer or simply ignore the question. But calling me an asshole, muting me and then chalking it all up to "me thinking you're insane because you believe in god" is quite the different tack than merely choosing not to answer...