If I was going to criticise an author, the title of their book would be the last place I would start. This criticism of Kratter feels ad hominem to me.

The bulk of what he has to say is contained within bullet points within the video itself. The title of the video is somewhat arbitrary. Comparing Kratter to legacy media is like comparing apples to bowling balls, but if you were being fair, a better comparison would be that of an op-ed

Op-ed - Wikipedia

Very online -- being so wrapped up in a niche internet slap fight, that one begins to believe their efforts are making a material impact beyond the diminishing crowd of people who care.

Kratter's brand is "Bitcoin University", and he's leveraging this platform that has been used to inform and educate to rabble rouse with what can only be described as conspiracy mongering. The guy is literally playing videos of Jack Kruse, a man who believes the government can remotely read his mind.

Like what we're doing right now?

I would prefer that this spam bitchfit remains on Twitter, which is why I am trying to highlight that Krater is immolating his reputation with low-rent engagement games.