Because of merged mining, hash power determining ownership, & open participation it seems there is zero opportunity cost or downside to large miners trying to steal the coins in any drivechain. And if all miners are mining a drivechain to keep it secure then it's just a crappy round about way to achieve bigger blocks.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
🤙
Mainchain blocksize remains the same and unaffected.
There is no guarantee a big block sidechain would ever gain adoption. If it did gain adoption so what? Maybe the Bcash community would finally accept defeat and come over to BTC again use that sidechain. And it may become more profitable for miners due to increase in transaction fees.
Bold claim: If anything drivechain has the potential to stop all the politics and unite all the shitcoins to bitcoin
Mainchain blocksize stays the same, but if competitive miner revenue comes to depend on mining a drivechain, that potentially changes the game in a big way, much like big blocks.
I don't give a flying fuck what bcashers want. I want to scale Bitcoin without gambling with major incentives. Something like the new spiderchain proposal or tokens on lightning sound much more promising. Lets make use of the many unused features that already exist before we start forking things again.
In there minds, network effects only apply to Bitcoin 😂