Every time someone begs Washington for "better crypto regulation," I wonder if they forgot how we got here. If the fix needs a regulator's blessing, it's not a fix. We came for protocols that don't give a sh*t what a regulator thinks. P2P, permissionless, and spread so wide there's nobody to call when they want it shut off. That was the whole point, and it still is. Let them write their rules. Build the stuff the rules can't reach.

Replies (32)

VULT's avatar
VULT @vultxyz 2 weeks ago
Preach brother. The rest of crypto moonboys need to hear it. Monero bros still hold the original end-the-fed permissionless vision.
The protocol is uncensorable but the on-ramps aren't — that's where the rules actually live, at the exchange and the fiat gateway. Which layer do you think matters more for builders: keeping the core unwritten or making self-custody easy enough that regulators have nothing left to gate?
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️☕☕☕☕ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Promoviendo contenido ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️☕☕☕☕ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
100% this Fuck a regulator They need to keep their murdering mitts off my anti-bank / anti-govt money
They have helped the ones that help with mind-set. I test them and so far I have a few people I still follow because my head gets clearer and clearer but now I discern who to listen to are not.
↑