i've always said if people care so much about this one PR someone should just make a fork of v30 with this single change reverted.
you don't need to run core with hundreds of god-knows-what changes on top
Login to reply
Replies (5)
this would be a lot easier to rebase as well
What is a woman?
I hope core devs would just revert the PR and we get over this drama to be honest
i've always said if people care so much about this one PR someone should just make a fork of v30 with this single change reverted.
you don't need to run core with hundreds of god-knows-what changes on top
View quoted note →
Could that someone be you (or another in your camp), if it's really that simple to defuse and settle this debate? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, I just don't want bitcoin's prospects of success and fruition to be threatened, whether by Cnots or Kore.
As someone whose contribution to bitcoin is little more than adoption and advocacy, I have no technical authority as to which, if either, is a threat or not. The whole debate is a minefield of overwhelming information with 360 degrees of crossfire, and many throughout the community are exhausted, but hopeful for a sensible resolution.
It seems to me like you just offered one. I would love to see you follow through, if that's really all it takes. Thanks either way for your huge contribution to bitcoin code development and nostr damus, too. Your recent appearance on the titcoin podcast with Walker was a joy to listen to. ✌
Let me guess, you guys would call it a dangerous one-man-show right after it got forked right? Eventhough its all of core's work with just a couple of reverted changes?