semisol's avatar
semisol semisol@nostr.land 1 week ago
It was me that said that, but @liminal 🦠 probably did too as well. I think Luke has gone completely off the rails. The CSAM argument is not a good one as it will always be possible However, Core merging a change no one wanted, against common opinion, is a bad idea. It was always possible to have large OP_RETURNs or embed data. This does not mean we should encourage it or say it is welcome (such as via relay policy), though.
↑ Parent

Replies (2)

liminal 🦠's avatar
liminal 🦠 liminal@gitcitadel.com 1 week ago
I'm not going to claim that I said it, but I'm pretty much in a similar boat. Be wary on things that spark urgency and division. Responded because of the tag, but I don't care to be a voice in these conversations.
Svoboda's avatar
Svoboda svoboda@primal.net 1 week ago
It definitely seems like it was an overreaction to the announcement of the out-of-band offerings like Mara's SlipStream. Was it really encouraging it though? Or was it hoping that those misusing other, non-pruneable fields like witness data would take the olive branch and move their data use there so at least it could be pruned by those not running full archival nodes? Again, probably another overreaction that came out of the temporary Ordinal craze.
1 replies ↓
↑