there wont be any bip110 coins though 😅 thats not how soft forks work
your scenario of "forking off" happens if theres a coinciding ursf, which contrary to its name is a hard fork
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Wrong.
View quoted note →
ultimately without a coinciding ursf to bip110, the chainsplits cannot coexist.
its just the same utxo set.
functionally, you're not going to be able to interact with the network(s) properly as there would exist no mechanism to prevent your tx to not replay on all networks.
the idea that a stalled bip110 attempt creates an opportunity for proponents to forward bitcoins to detractors is wishful thinking 😅 or possibly pure avarice