The sentiment makes sense, but the data to support it seems weak. Almost feels Keynesian to me to be willing to support our talking points and ideas with knowingly poor data. - Where is it coming from? - What kinds of transactions is it missing?

Replies (2)

I’m sorry I’m not understanding your question? These data comes from the case studies that were provided after the conferences. These is all auditable information. I can safely say that for Bitcoin Atlantis and BH2023 you can check BTCPay Servers case studies. The information from the Bitcoin conference was provided by Strike
Just that conflating "transactions per attendee on the recommended platform we track" with the "quality of the crowd" is little disingenuous. it's a small sample of all the transactions happening during the conference. And it says more about how good a job the organizer did with onboarding the beer & coffee vendors than anything else. It's a good direction, but I wouldn't overfocus on this metric.