There's nothing wrong with a tail emission, even if you let the normal Bitcoin supply run on as is by the time the "21 millionth coin" is minted, the outstanding supply will be drastically lower. It's been only 17 years, and 17% of Bitcoin is already lost, by 2130 most Bitcoin would be gone by then leaving little to none to circulate. That's about 1% of Bitcoin lost per year, so in 100 years all Bitcoins would be lost, ignoring Satoshis coins which are unlikely to come back in circulation. There will never be 21 Million Bitcoin exactly, no matter how you slice it. image

Replies (6)

You can enjoy tail emissions on Monero and I have nothing against that. Other than that, FUD is not fun. Bitcoin is limited to maximum of 21 Million Bitcoins forever. And that is great!
Jordan S's avatar Jordan S
There won't ever be 21 Million Bitcoin but actually 20,999,999.9769 BTC that most people just round up. But no ever considers that this fundamental thing that the entire Fiat Maxi narrative is built on is a lie. They never cared about the technology, P2P trade, individual sovereignty, or freedom, they only care about their fiat bags, and making themselves richer in fiat. Don't trust anyone who says "21 Million" because they're lying to you.
View quoted note →
this is the same fiat minded gdp thinking. just because you have more profits doesn't mean there's more blood to suck out of the system. just because you have lost coins doesn't mean you should keep printing. that's the whole reason bitcoin exists. 1bitcoin = 1bitcoin. best thing you can do is adding more decimal points to bitcoin, so it can keep halving for a longer time.
I agree. There is Bitcoin with its philosophy, there is Monero with its philosophy and many more. Let their be a thousand different flowers to choose from aka ways to hedge and for the market to value different things for different needs.
There is everything wrong with a tail emission. There is also 2.1 quadrillion sats, plenty of unts to keep using. image