Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 3
Generated: 05:08:12
Now I remember why you got kicked out of the Nostr Telegram group in the early days of nostr. You get needlessly personal. I am a dev and I do know how to manage liquidity in lightning. That has nothing to do with the discussion we are having LN works as intended. And that's the problem, because the way it works is not enough Even if you are a gigabrain managing liquidity flawlessly, that's still terrible UX, and you are not gonna change human behaviour en masse to make it work We can change the topic to talk about how dumb everyone except you is but that doesn't change the fact that lightning doesn't scale the number of users that can use Bitcoin, it only scales the number of txns we can make
2025-11-12 14:14:58 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (3)

my prediction on this is that stuff like NWC in nostr, combined with a replication consensus protocol for things like a name service protocol (i'm making one called Free Internet Daemon), will be where the legitimate progress with lightning happens. lightning has no consensus, so individuals are the atom of the security. with a consensus system, where multiple parties can decentralize a coordination system, according to an appropriate set of rules for the process, things that we see currently centralized in for example the alby hub isolated wallets, can become a protocol. once you get to the point where you can trustlessly coordinate such a group wallet, and the consensus has full 50% byzantine fault tolerance, like bitcoin (my design has this property, it uses web of trust attestations) then we have solved the increase users problem. increase transactions solution is a prerequisite. anyhow. that's one of the half dozen little side things i'm doing at the moment. i probably should focus on that one more because my most favourite programming task is designing and implementing a novel consensus protocol.
2025-11-12 14:38:19 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 2 replies ↓ Reply