NaturalNerd's avatar
NaturalNerd 6 months ago
@₿en Wehrman would you be willing to debate @Jack Spirko about flat earth. At one point he had an open invitation to debate. One person backed out.
₿en Wehrman's avatar ₿en Wehrman
Something the last week has taught me is that, until one has gone down the #FlatEarth rabbit hole, they simply do not have the tools required to comprehend just how big of a lie the manipulators of this world will create to keep them lost in an illusion. https://rumble.com/playlists/KoyNB8GPN58
View quoted note →

Replies (9)

I'd certainly watch, but it might be worth starting smaller with the moon landings. Pretty sure Jack still believes those were real
NaturalNerd's avatar
NaturalNerd 6 months ago
I just remember a flat earth debate was set up. I would love either, live stream it on nostr 🤞
Jack has been shrugging off alternative possibilities to mainstream narratives as "conspiracy theory" on his pod lately, so I'd say the likelihood is low that he partakes. He'll probably just say a flat earth debate is retarded, and that he has better things to do w his time. I truly hope his recent reliance on ai doesn't ossify his critical thinking and that he keeps some intellectual humility and openness moving forward.. I owe him a lot for being one of the ones to lead me to bitcoin and nostr
NaturalNerd's avatar
NaturalNerd 6 months ago
I have just noticed that with the moon landing. What other conspiracy theories has he mentioned? I got into bitcoin and nostr because of jack as well. He helped me develop my critical thinking skills. He also gave me the final push into homesteading while helping me get over trying to make everything Paul Wheaton level of 'Eco'.
NaturalNerd's avatar
NaturalNerd 6 months ago
That would be great. Ben you have done the deepest dive into this out of anyone on my radar.
The dismissal of any charlie kirk stuff, and repeatedly using red herring logical fallacies (mainly surrounding the ballistics and the details of the "shooter") Most of the "conspiracy theories" surrounding that event don't mention either of those things. They're irrelevant if it was indeed a psyop fake shooting with a Hollywood blood squib in his shirt which pops before the "bullet" makes impact. The main video that's been used has been altered by ai, and the black dot that becomes the bullet hole moves around (clear to see when slowed down). Also no blood splatter, no blood in the parking lot on the way to the SUV (why were there no first responders anywhere, let alone ambulances? A concert around here in Texas with a few hundred people has that, and this was a college event with thousands) There are other past conspiracies he's hand waved but I can't remember which off the top of my head. Conviction on various topics has served him well (and the audience), but thinking you're always right and anyone who thinks differently is retarded is intellectually lazy. Just my 2 sats