It's all so tiresome. The fact that the most heated tirades against the BIP don't actually touch the technicals is telling

Addressing the technical view it seems above his paygrade. Or, or, his owner are very susceptible. Who knows.

I know this wasn't addressed to me, but... What I want is for both sides to stop trying to force their opinions on the rest of the network. Frankly, IDGAF about the technical merits of BIP110 as long as its leading proponents are behaving like lunatics. From what I have seen, it is your side that needs to apologize for making personal attacks before you can reasonably ask others to just focus on the technical merits. Until then, a plague on both your houses.

If Luke shaves his terrible beard and sacrifices one child in the proudest of his biblical traditions I will switch to becoming an unhinged 110 retard.

It's highly likely that @ODELL won't be able to answer any of these questions because Odell spends more time kissing coretards and spammers (like RobHam) ass than researching more about spam and BIP110. I also think that @Matthew Kratter will completely destroy @ODELL's VC & simpfluencer career by the time spam war is over. View quoted note →

Sounds like a perfect Bitcoin Mechanic analogy 😂

🦗🦗🦗

He won't reply to this. Just like back in the day, him talking shit an Saylor, then softball interviews him during the Nashville Shitcoin magazine conference.

lnbc1p5e55kdpp520w7f6v2tk2veaykk44ul942e7myxanlj5va98y28xysljmlkvtsdqqcqzzgxqyz5vqrzjqf0wu22xsefd8gzu0m9n93g2khea86l6yy26en9v46g9e6hk7v9z8efmpx7z45ml2cqqqqryqqqqthqqpyrzjqfwdd2w9y5ra5z3m4qetfa5ccu6432xfuvk6zrvg9vxwltvukd48defmpx7z45ml2cqqqqryqqqqthqqpysp57qtxvkzzpjw8kmrndz2xt7clegmefwu7ntvgcgag47e6l0m808vq9qrsgqvtjvu9vawdeqsnwt7gdgn9kqyka9xzcr823njfw09y2s4a467ltsp6mja4ed6u5lvvp044h04ekr557ya2qn36yl9rhshk5ak20q8pgpxxugum Donate any sats to get food for the kids at the orphanage

What size hat should I put you down for? Will tiny do?

Want OP_RETURN to continue to be consensus valid. Miners running reasonable defaults should not be punished.

There are no sides. There's just parasites using Bitcoin for storing trash. Then there's bitcoiners pushing back against it with a bunch of moronic influencors getting in the way. Personal attacks are inevitable. I actually don't do a lot of it, though obviously lose patience every now and again. If *all you have* is personal attacks like Odell then yeah, people are going to call that out. Also, it's incredibly stupid to judge BIP-110 because people you dislike are yelling at others about it. If you want civilized discourse you're really just asking for centralized decision making. It's chaotic, live with it.

> There are no sides...now here are the sides... 😂 The existence of a BIP necessarily creates sides. That doesn't mean either side is monolithic. It is possible to oppose spam while also opposing a particular proposed solution to spam. > it's incredibly stupid to judge BIP-110 because people you dislike are yelling It's not just random people yelling. It's the leading proponents. Seems like a red flag. And I didn't even dislike them prior to the yelling. > If you want civilized discourse you're really just asking for centralized decision making. If you believe this, I think you have failed to understand bitcoin (and free markets, and the entire history of western civilization).