Replies (63)

Hey! Totally understand the concern. Here’s some context: We recently removed the Lightning feature from the app to stay focused on its core mission: secure, self-custodial Bitcoin savings. Lightning is still a promising technology, but the current self-custodial experience just wasn’t reliable enough for our users. We’re keeping an eye on it and plan to revisit it once it matures. As for the face scan, it’s part of our effort to comply with the new EU regulation DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act). To protect users from fraud and identity theft, we now require biometric verification, but we do this WITHOUT storing any biometric data. We use Keyless, a privacy-preserving solution that creates a cryptographic key using your facial scan locally on your device. That data is NEVER stored by us or anywhere else )not on our servers, not in the cloud). It’s just a way to verify that you are you, while keeping your privacy intact.
I use Mt Pelerin / Bridge. I didn't need to KYC. Their lightning is custodial but you can open channels with their node and send them to your non-custodial lightning. On chain is non-custodial.
On bisq you can even buy with a negative premium. Also, I like how it works : It is really decentralized, on Tor and It gives me the feeling to really use bitcoin because you have to make some transactions. Negative point : it is only on desktop (for now)
LaserEyesPsy's avatar
LaserEyesPsy 7 months ago
Yeah must admit back when I was using it a year ago, the Ln function was really unreliable. Can’t blame. But the UE compliance and regulation is getting ridiculous. Sadge.
I have just installed bisq. I must admit that it looks more complete than robosats, with all the stats and tweaks it's looks like a decentralized exchange while robosats or peach looks more like a simple market of classified ads. There's only bitcoin on-chain on bisq right ? No lightning ? Did you tried to buy XMR or stable there too ?
Diego Valley's avatar
Diego Valley 7 months ago
Good suggestions below. But in person p2p also should be considered
However, my message was to point out that although we have to be compliant with the rules, we have chosen the way that protects our users' data
nix's avatar
nix 7 months ago
I know it is easy for me to say it and harder for you to do as a business, but we need to find ways around such requirements. I would not use a btc app which requires me to scan my face. I'd rather use a non EU company over VPN etc.
Why self custodial lightning, people might opt-in for custodial as well ?
Dora is bullshit. It was never to protect the user. It is to control the finacial institutions and their users and at the same time to protect the large players with the standards nobody can comply, except a few largest.
“To buy Bitcoin with Bitagent, you need a wallet with which you can sign a message with the private key of the Bitcoin address. The signature with the private key is proof that the address actually belongs to you.” What? Why? 🚩
Use Zeus, Phoenix or any other non-custodial wallet. You can buy non-kyc with Robosats, Peach, MtPelerin or Bisq. I ditched Relai as soon as they removed the non-kyc option. Still use some services that require KYC but for some specific use cases only.
Feel free to ask this to privacy@relai.app, as I’m not a lawyer 🙂
We had only implemented a third-party service (Breez SDK) within our application. Therefore, we had no direct control over its development
Hi Neo, the signing of a message is the proof that you are the owner of the Bitcoin address, because you need the private key for that. If you use the Bitagent Wallet that happens automaticly in the background. If you bring your own Wallet you have to do it manually. If you have a Bitbox02 it works automatically with AOPP.
Lightning Payout is possible to Zeus or Breez. You need there also to sign a message on your lightning node Id, to prove that you are the owner of that lightning wallet