At least LN is a monetary reason to keep a non-ideal feature until it is replaced by a better solve.
Non-monetary = fine if non-threat.
Monetary = usage.
That’s the simplest model I usually fall back to when looking at this.
Threat is real with features that could lead to blockchain-stored content that is a crime by existence.
Threat is lower, but non-zero, on blockchain bloat for node runners gradually reducing node participation and thus reducing breadth of policy adoption scrutiny.
