I had a very similar experience of the block size war. It was an incredibly confusing time. I ended up trusting my gut and it paid off.
The arguments I was hearing from Roger were disingenuous and sensationalized. His alignment with CSW basically sealed the deal for me. I know there were bigger more important figures on the big block side, but those were the faces I saw most often.
I hadn't thought of it in terms of time preference as you stated above, but that's a clear way to think about it.
At the moment I feel similarly confused about the Knots / Core fight, but I feel much less concerned about it.
I'm running knots, not because I'm heavily aligned with the knots team or their pathos arguments, but because I didn't trust the disingenuous ethos arguments coming from core or their entitlement towards making software changes that affect everyone.
Honestly at this point I'm wondering if taproot was a mistake, specifically in the way it was rolled out. Tick tock next block regardless.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
I find the knots and bip-110 incredibly disingenuous. The emergency nature is a telltale. Anyone who shouts that there is an emergency and uses the protect the children line of thought is not to be trusted. That is how the state behaves.
Let's pretend that bip-110 is right and spam is a real threat to the existence of Bitcoin in the long run, how should this be handled differently?