🤔 Math is this tricky thing... Its less objective than people realize, I think. It starts with symbolic and false assumptions (numbers), though true enough to get started, then goes through logic (the math, also Logos), then comes back to a false but useful enough symbolic conclusion - a number. Only the middle part is objective, and its not objective in the way people usually use the word. I'm not saying 4+4=anything other than 8. The process is the objecrivity. But if you measure a table as 4 feet long, then you're actually wrong. It's actually 4 feet and some decimal with infinite digits. But the measurement was useful enough. So what I'm saying is, Truth isn't a static thing - its a process - so neither can objective reality be static things. Symbols are representative of a reality we can interact with (process) but never actually know. This might've been off topic. Anyways...