I see you are new to this debate and don’t realise why blowing op returns was the reason why BIP-110 was drafted in the first place. No goalposts have been moved, you’re simply ignorant. I have great reading sources for you if you decide to improve your knowledge:

Replies (2)

Y'all could have switched to Bitcoin gold if you wanted a different hashing algorithm that's resistant to miner centralisation. Instead you let Luke choose an algorithm his friends have the hardware for and created a more centralised chain. The fact it's already filling up with cp is something that Luke should have planned against from the beginning. Obviously the people from core that want to use Btc as csam hosting will actively put csam on any blockchain they can, especially anything that could be seen as a threat to Btc. Luke should have prevented this in the first place, the whole argument being about spam and then he creates a shitcoin that leaves the doors wide open for spam. Shits rediculous
Okay so the first website makes the bonkers assertion that the reason the price went down in the last cycle was because the market reacted to the release of Core 30; that tolerance of spam chisels away the monetary properties of bitcoin. Despite the fact that the vast majority of bitcoin holders don't even know what version Core is at (much less run Core), they are sitting at their desks, refreshing some node stats website as they plan their retirement. Delusional. Easily falsified if/when the price recovers. But the hairshirt XBT / BIP-110 crowd is so thoroughly intellectually dishonest that they will tapdance around that and say something so stupid my imagination seizes up when I try to predict it. Maybe something like "The market is currently irrational" or "The price is manipulated by Blockstream to prove Luke wrong."
↑