In the future not everyone will have the right to use layer 1, ARK for example offers privacy by default and without custody, also because of its architecture you can have hardware wallets in the absence of solving the problem of the rounds with the notes. With bitcoin L1 you can use coinjoins and get the same or more privacy than with Monero. On the other hand Monero is not scalable and its dynamic block size equates to losing decentralization if it were to be massively adopted.

Replies (1)

"In the future not everyone will have the right to use layer 1" Brilliant. The resounding success of "sound money" - accessible to the privileged alone, afforded none of the benefits of security as a tradeoff of percieved anonymity. Have you ever run a lightning node? "With bitcoin L1 you can use coinjoins and get the same or more privacy than with Monero." Samurai says hi. Coinjoins will be eliminated in the process, they already are working on getting rid of them and jailing anyone working on them. You seem to spend a lot of time attacking Monero. Why are you so concerned about it if it's not scalable, not decentralized and keeps losing value to Bitcoin? Do you think this is an effective strategy to win over people who value privacy as a defence mechanism against the state?