🤦‍♂️ I'm sorry, are we going to start calling shitcoiners adjacent now? No! They are entirely in opposition to Bitcoin Majlis and SAIF. There may be common terms used by them but the meaning behind them is operating on a completely different metaphysic Personally, I have yet to find one of their articles that was intellectually stimulating. @Muslim Bitcoiner before you consider engaging with them (especially on their terms and territory) ensure they have unblocked you first. I personally don't think engaging at their level is appropriate - if they are an honest mag their editors should straight up pull this garbage. Take note that it was timed a week after TT published their interview with @Kode so there is clear dialogue between the two. This wasn't just a friendly tap. This was an intentional attack and needs to be responded in kind. Have someone else from @BitcoinMajlis respond (there are plenty in the majlis capable) if you think there's benefit but know that offer is not a concession. You already wrote a whole book on this! Publishing an op-ed in their space is not terms that move the standard toward bitcoin or digital hijra. Their operative environment is an attention seeking space. The underlying rules of engagement in that zone matter to us. In respect to a response, uncompromising bitcoin maximalism is deserved. The Kasurian project has ultimately sacrificed divine sovereignty for the sake of fiat integration. Digital hijra unviels that. Don't enter the coal mines expecting to find gold.