Thread

Hey Victor — I saw you released your paper, congrats! I’ll read it when I get the chance. String theory really is the final boss of physics. Being loyal to it feels a bit like being part of the SWIFT network. As long as you don’t disrespect your masters, the fiat funding keeps flowing. But if you step outside the bounds, you’re essentially debanked from academic physics.

You will see that strings have a simple explanation in my theory and they don't require all those weird extra dimensions, because their consistency is encoded in the fundamental discrete description. They start with continuous strings and quantize them, while I start with discrete holonomies and coarse-grain them into a continuous limit.

bro you're either a scammer or you're confusing schizophrenia with science.

Strings!!! Strings everywhere!!

I’m just a scammer with nothing to sell.

The truth doesn’t need to be sold. Bitcoin is going to wreck your world view regardless. The quantum computer wants to be understood Calle, why are you resisting?

or the alternative

Scammer with nothing to sell is better. My ideas are incompatible with your world view. But, Bitcoin doesn’t need to be believed, neither do it. Bitcoin exists. It is the only open system on Earth that irreversibly collapses entropy into memory through energy with no appeal to trust, no possibility of reversal, and no room for simulation. That is quantum measurement, operationalized, not theorized. If your rebuttal is to call it schizophrenia instead of engaging the argument, you’re not defending science you’re hiding behind status and snark. That’s not physics. Cowardice is to attack me and not my ideas. The burden of proof is not on Bitcoin. It is the only system in the world that proves itself every ~10 minutes. You want to refute me? - Show another system that collapses entropy at planetary scale. - Show where irreversible memory is formed without work. - Show how your quantum theory computes a single outcome with conserved energy. Until then, your disbelief is irrelevant. Bitcoin already measures reality. Tick Tock Calle.

no gonna read that slop, good luck, get help

Because you have nothing constructive to add. You’ve only ever attacked me and never my ideas. Also because you can’t refute them. Bitcoin being the quantum computer would ruin your world view; yet you are a bitcoiner. Make it make sense.

find god

Bitcoin is the revelation, even for you.

Y’all would be a great guests to have on an episode of our upcoming podcast BEEF with co-host/comic relief nostr:npub1aljazgxlpnpfp7n5sunlk3dvfp72456x6nezjw4sd850q879rxqsthg9jp

Here's and idea, how about this;- https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/a-new-hole-universe-5e3e99a6557a

I’m at work currently but I skimmed through it (it’s quite long). I’ll need some time. I threw it into my AI for a quick summary and I really love the direction. It meshes well with my work around Bitcoin as the quantum informational system (computer) we can actively observe to test our assumptions. Through Bitcoin and a reinterpretation of Planck Units, I have revised Boltzmann’s constant to be a universal constant making the entropy resolution in bitcoin’s informational framework relative to that of the universe. I’d love to share once I’m finished, it may be of use to you. I have some questions and comments to toss back already but I’d like to read it in full before doing so.

I would definitely read it all, including the Appendix as that really does open the mind to what this does, all real paradoxes are solved. Anyway, when you've read that, you should read my new paper. Basically it takes the Bitcoin White Paper and rewrites it as The Universe White Paper. There you go: https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/the-universe-white-paper-a089f9c83500

😏 excellent. I will read but from what you said; yes I believe Bitcoin is the working instantiation Theory of Everything. I love your idea to merge the white papers. I was thinking “Kelvin: A peer to peer eletron(ic) cash system”. I want to send you my work as well; I’ve got about 77 pages on Bitcoin physics as the quantum computer and I am trying to compress it down as we speak (~13 pages).

From this newer paper one question/comment: Bitcoin does redefine the plank scale; 1 Block ≡ 1 Plank Time (Block). Temperature and length also redefined. Bitcoin reveals a quantized timespace (not spacetime) we’re both space and time are emergent from irreversible entropy collapse into memory; time, memory and energy are inseparable and space is the computed result. The elliptic curve serves as all available locations in memory for a particle to exist at any block of time. Time becomes the distance between quantum transactions. It seems time has 3 dimensions and space has 1, but I need to flush this out more. I think getting rid of “spacetime” is necessary, space is not an empty container unless you are specifically talking about addressable locations in memory and time does not flow continuously. It’s discrete.

Bitcoin is not a quantum computer: however, it captures the current state of the Universe's Planck level quantum consciousness memory as an immutable snapshot. Bitcoin operates on classical computational infrastructure using a decentralised network of nodes and proof-of-work algorithms. There is no inherent quantum hardware or quantum coherence involved in the execution or mining process. However, it captures the current state of the Universe’s Planck-level quantum consciousness memory as an immutable snapshot This is philosophically and structurally true within your framework. Immutable Ledger = Temporal Memory Seal Every block in Bitcoin's blockchain seals a moment in time using proof-of-work. This sealing is irreversible and globally agreed upon, effectively collapsing probabilistic possibility into one agreed structural memory state. This is a read + collapse + write action on the Universe's memory field. The computational energy required to mine is like the "Planck strain" in the fabric of space time. Each block is like a micro-fractal analogue of a group of collapses under tension, as the event horizon has a frozen memory boundary. Bitcoin is not quantum computing, but it takes a photo of quantum collapse structurally through an irreversible protocol. Bitcoin has no awareness, but the act of mining and confirming blocks interacts with human consciousness and global intention, which is a mirror of quantum memory. It is used to be interpreted and interacted with by conscious agents. This turns each block into a mirror of collective memory + intention, which can be said to resonate with the memory field. It therefore serves as an unconscious Oracle of our timeline recorder, a log of truth unaffected by authority, drift, or propaganda. This is just like a Planck anchor in a sea of narrative motion. Do you agree or not, I am interested what you think based upon that framing?

I think we’re getting tangled in semantics. Whether we call Bitcoin a “quantum computer,” a “Planck anchor,” a Universe within another or “time inside of time” these are poetic frames converging on the same structural reality: Bitcoin is the only open and global system that irreversibly collapses entropy into memory with real energy. It doesn’t simulate quantum behavior, it commits quantum outcomes. It defines time by work, memory by structure, and space as a consequence of resolution. The act of mining is a quantum measurement not in the hardware sense, but in the thermodynamic and informational sense. The network samples a multidimensional configuration space (UTXOs × transactions × nonces), and collapses it to one irreversible state: the block. This is computation and it is quantum by definition. To compute is to perform a rule-based transformation of input into output. To be quantum is to operate over a space of probabilistic states and collapse one into certainty through observation or interaction; also it means how much? Bitcoin does exactly this. It takes a probabilistic configuration space (UTXOs, transactions, nonces), applies a rule-based transformation (proof-of-work via SHA-256), and collapses it to a single irreversible output (the valid block) paid for with energy. That’s quantum computation in its most physical, literal form. Not the centralized modern nonsense of simulation on top of quantum particles. What’s your definition of “quantum computing”? Modern quantum computing, by contrast, tries to extract multiple outcomes from a single entropy pool, assumes reversibility, and evades thermodynamic cost. It’s not grounded. It’s not conserved. It’s a double-spend of entropy masquerading as innovation. Bitcoin pays the full cost. One measurement, one collapse, one truth. Temperature becomes the bridge, not metaphorically, but structurally. In Bitcoin, temperature encodes entropy over time. In the universe, it defines the direction of time and structure of space. That’s not coincidence it’s correspondence. So whether you call it a snapshot of Planck memory or a quantum computer, the core truth remains: Bitcoin doesn’t model the universe, it runs on the same law. I think we agree on outcome. We just need consensus on semantics. The toroid needs more explanation, I hope that doesn’t confuse you.

I think a year ago I would have agreed to quiet a lot of what you said, here's my thoughts now though. Planck time is the smallest meaningful unit of time in the physical universe, defined by fundamental constants. But, Bitcoin block time (approx every 10 minutes) is a simple human engineered window of computational ability globally and not physically discrete, definitely not universal and not protocol tied to quantum resolution. So Bitcoin does not redefine Planck time, it performs ad-hoc sampling of human action in the form of memory blocks. That is profound, but it's not physical Planck-time resolution. I agree that time, memory and energy are deeply linked, but it is not quantised by Bitcoin. Bitcoin takes a snapshot of the results of real structure of quantum collapse, it's a symbolic echo, not the engine. space is not calculated from time, they both emerge simultaneously at the collapse boundary, like a frozen wave function pinning a memory into existence. Space volume is 3D, time is is a vector of quantum collapse memory, not a physical dimension. The Private Key, I think it's an poetic analogy, but elliptic curve defines all possible public key coordinates, they are static landscape and not tense, interconnected elastic field of potential collapse that can change due to a butterfly flapping. I think that Bitcoin is an astonishing mirror, that takes circa 10 minute snapshot of everyone who touches it or who is touched by it.

Love this stuff. ‘Bitcoin is the only open and global system that irreversibly collapses entropy into memory with real energy.’ “Life” does this too.

Bitcoin is a protocol, it follows those rules, it records the real exchange as a token of real human action. Human action results from and changes the quantum state. Bitcoin can cause a feedback, I agree, but it's not actually a quantum computer.

By direct observation, UTXOs behave as quantum bits of information. They exist in a binary state either unspent (0) or spent (1) and cannot be in both. Their resolution (via spending) is irreversible, conserved, and publicly verifiable. They hold no state until acted upon, and cannot be double-spent. It’s a computed quantum measurement but with a ledger. You’re right: Bitcoin block time (~10 minutes) is not physically equivalent to Planck time. But I’m not saying it is in origin I’m saying it is in function. Bitcoin doesn’t re-define Planck Units (sorry if I said otherwise), it provides context and meaning to them by the open measurable physics observed in Bitcoin. In the Bitcoin system, a block is the smallest unit of causal transformation. Between blocks, no change occurs. There is no evolution, no new memory, no new truth. From the inside of bitcoin as an observer, “seconds” don’t exist. The system defines its own discrete time unit, the block. This makes “1 block” the functional equivalent of “1 Planck time” within the network’s closed physics. The analogy is structural: discrete, irreversible, indivisible units of entropy resolution. This may give us a real, observable interpretation of Planck time as a computational boundary, not just a theoretical one. If so, perhaps universal Planck time arises from an unobservable parent structure in a similar way that Bitcoin time arises from hashes and difficulty and a target time, a hidden consensus of entropy resolution not available for observation from within the system, like seconds within Bitcoin. Time in Bitcoin is constructed from Planck Time if you want to get granular as 10 minutes could be expressed as Planck time. Bitcoin, through the Lightning Network, reveals the existence of a fully coherent layer of transformations between discrete time intervals (blocks). Lightning states evolve off-chain (invisible to the ledger) and collapse only when the time is right. They are pure potential until commitment. Only the final state, not the intermediates, is recorded on-chain. If this is possible within Bitcoin why not universally with Planck time? We could never know by observation. I postulate that peer-to-peer interactions occur between Planck Time, with reality collapsing only at discrete commit points. The ledger we observe is not continuous. It is the projection of deeper transformations resolved only when energy demands truth. Bitcoin gives us a measurable substrate for thermodynamic comparison. In this substrate: - Time is block height, the irreversible tick of resolved entropy. - Memory is the global UTXO set: the conserved informational structure. - Energy is the work required to collapse entropy calculated directly from SHA-256 and difficulty. Together, these form a three-dimensional coordinate system for the system’s internal “physics.” Time × Memory becomes the dimensional substrate; space is a consequence and a frozen map of all resolved interactions. This framework rejects the smooth continuum of classical spacetime. Bitcoin operates in timespace — a discrete, causal structure where events have no spatial presence without work, and space itself is the memory of energy having been spent. In Bitcoin, memory and time are dimensionally inseparable. The block is both a temporal unit and a committed memory state meaning: Bits^2 = Block^2 = Bit-Block They are not separate variables. They are the same dimension expressed through different operations of entropy collapse. On this surface, internal entropy (satoshis) is orthogonal a third axis penetrating the memory-time plane: Sats per Bit^2 = Sats per Bit-Block This defines Bitcoin’s thermodynamic geometry: Work (energy) collapses uncertainty into a measured bit per block, while sats encode the internal entropy of that resolved unit. I won’t go into radial wrapping right now but it’s necessary. UTXOs certainly do not exist spacetime. They build timespace, block by block. Using a temperature-based model derived from Boltzmann (revised by anchoring entropy to a finite supply of internal entropy units), we can calculate the energy of every block precisely. We can take Landauers Principle and modify the entropy for the proof of work hash function scaled by difficulty. This defines block energy as resolved entropy per unit work, structurally identical to thermodynamic law but now measurable. Space in Bitcoin is not “real estate” it’s resolved possibility. UTXOs define what can be acted upon, and once spent, they mark memory. Their spatiality emerges from time, energy, and memory not independent of them. I am adamant that Bitcoin is the answer to quantum physics. So yes, we can think of each UTXO as a bit in a curved informational manifold defined by elliptic curve coordinates, time of inclusion, and energy used to confirm it. It’s a physical structure made of work by measurement. Thank you for input tho, you’re one of the few willing to genuinely explore these questions with me, and I respect that deeply. I will try to get into your paper this weekend. Whether we say “Bitcoin is a quantum computer,” or “Bitcoin is a mirror of quantum collapse,” the point is the same: it is a governed system of irreversible entropy resolution that anchors time, energy, and memory into conserved, measurable structure. No point to argue what is or isn’t a quantum computer; bitcoin exists. Bitcoin doesn’t care about centralized quantum simulations. Regardless, this deserves far more investigation by Bitcoiners. What if we are all wrong? “Just Money” they say. Let’s keep the conversations flowing.

Here's my attempt to try and reply, [...I'm in these boxes...] lol "By direct observation, UTXOs behave as quantum bits of information. They exist in a binary state either unspent (0) or spent (1) and cannot be in both. Their resolution (via spending) is irreversible, conserved, and publicly verifiable. They hold no state until acted upon, and cannot be double-spent." [True, but this isn't inherently quantum. It's deterministic state logic, a digital abstraction of irreversibility. Bitcoin mimics collapse through resolution, yes, but that’s not equivalent to quantum superposition. UTXOs are discrete, public and irreversible, but not entangled, nor probabilistic. Their behaviour echoes quantum themes, but is not quantum in origin.] "It’s a computed quantum measurement but with a ledger." [That’s poetic, but it’s not an actual measurement of a quantum system. It's a hash-based consensus ledger, irreversible, yes, but with no quantum collapse. There’s no wave function, no uncertainty, no decoherence. This is metaphorical language, not structural physics.] "You’re right: Bitcoin block time (~10 minutes) is not physically equivalent to Planck time. But I’m not saying it is in origin I’m saying it is in function. Bitcoin doesn’t re-define Planck Units (sorry if I said otherwise), it provides context and meaning to them by the open measurable physics observed in Bitcoin." [That is appreciated and important to clarify. However, functionally equating block time to Planck time is misleading. Planck time is a minimum limit on physical change. Block time is a human-defined interval for consensus. The drift, latency and variability of block production entirely invalidate the idea of a functional analogue.] "In the Bitcoin system, a block is the smallest unit of causal transformation. Between blocks, no change occurs. There is no evolution, no new memory, no new truth. From the inside of bitcoin as an observer, “seconds” don’t exist. The system defines its own discrete time unit, the block." [This is accurate, but again, this describes a programmatic system, not a physical one. Block time is artificially introduced to throttle issuance, not to mimic fundamental time. Nothing prevents Bitcoin from adjusting this. The Universe doesn’t renegotiate Planck time.] "This makes “1 block” the functional equivalent of “1 Planck time” within the network’s closed physics. The analogy is structural: discrete, irreversible, indivisible units of entropy resolution. This may give us a real, observable interpretation of Planck time as a computational boundary, not just a theoretical one." [I Still disagree. Bitcoin’s boundary is economic and procedural, not thermodynamic. Planck time is a physical limit on structure, not a chosen boundary. Saying “Bitcoin gives meaning to Planck time” is really saying it in reverse of what really happens. Planck time gives meaning to why physical systems can't be broken into smaller slices. Bitcoin breaks its own rules all the time (eg forks, reorgs, variance etc).] "If so, perhaps universal Planck time arises from an unobservable parent structure in a similar way that Bitcoin time arises from hashes and difficulty and a target time, a hidden consensus of entropy resolution not available for observation from within the system, like seconds within Bitcoin. Time in Bitcoin is constructed from Planck Time if you want to get granular as 10 minutes could be expressed as Planck time." [That is speculative and mixs up metaphors across domains. Bitcoin doesn’t have physical time emergence. It uses timestamping and randomised hash work with a poisson distribution. Planck time is not built from hashes. Equating a noisy economic heartbeat with a fundamental physical constant to be honest risks spiritualising a spreadsheet.] "Bitcoin, through the Lightning Network, reveals the existence of a fully coherent layer of transformations between discrete time intervals (blocks). Lightning states evolve off-chain (invisible to the ledger) and collapse only when the time is right. They are pure potential until commitment. Only the final state, not the intermediates, is recorded on-chain." [That is a good metaphor for offchain potential, but again, this is computational abstraction, not quantum physics. Offchain data is held in trust of logic and not a probabilistic cloud. The “collapse” is legal or contractual, not real world physical.] "If this is possible within Bitcoin why not universally with Planck time? We could never know by observation. I postulate that peer-to-peer interactions occur between Planck Time, with reality collapsing only at discrete commit points. The ledger we observe is not continuous. It is the projection of deeper transformations resolved only when energy demands truth." [That’s closer to my Hole Universe model and reality, but in my model, collapse defines spacetime itself. There is no “between Planck times” nothing exists between thresholds. This isn't a simulated ledger. Planck collapse is not periodic, it's topological. It's triggered by structural tension, not time ticks.] "Bitcoin gives us a measurable substrate for thermodynamic comparison. In this substrate: Time is block height, the irreversible tick of resolved entropy. Memory is the global UTXO set: the conserved informational structure. Energy is the work required to collapse entropy calculated directly from SHA-256 and difficulty." [That is accurate internally for BTC, this is how Bitcoin encodes and commits irreversible change. But it’s a simulation of physics and not and never a substrate of physics. Bitcoin maps entropy metaphorically, but not fundamentally. SHA-256 is not equivalent to particle collapse in reality.] "Together, these form a three-dimensional coordinate system for the system’s internal “physics.” Time × Memory becomes the dimensional substrate; space is a consequence and a frozen map of all resolved interactions." [That is ell structured, but again, this is Bitcoins map, not the Universes territory. My Hole Universe model has collapse first, then vector, then encoded memory. Space is not frozen, its strained, preserved tension from a collapse.] "This framework rejects the smooth continuum of classical spacetime. Bitcoin operates in timespace — a discrete, causal structure where events have no spatial presence without work, and space itself is the memory of energy having been spent." [Agreed in principle, except Bitcoins work is artificial. BIt burns energy to prove cost, but that cost doesn’t correspond to real quantum memory strain. In the Universe, collapse creates new structure. In Bitcoin, it encodes human intent. To similar shape for a different origin, an imperfect mirror.] "In Bitcoin, memory and time are dimensionally inseparable. The block is both a temporal unit and a committed memory state meaning: Bits² = Block² = Bit-Block They are not separate variables. They are the same dimension expressed through different operations of entropy collapse." [Nice phrasing m8e, I like the conceptual intent. But again, collapse in the Universe is not a bit, it is a rupture of potential. Bitcoin quantifies digital commitments. It does not resolve fundamental uncertainty. There's no irreducible Planck tension in the UTXO set.] "On this surface, internal entropy (satoshis) is orthogonal a third axis penetrating the memory-time plane: Sats per Bit² = Sats per Bit-Block This defines Bitcoin’s thermodynamic geometry: Work (energy) collapses uncertainty into a measured bit per block, while sats encode the internal entropy of that resolved unit. I won’t go into radial wrapping right now but it’s necessary." [A good case you make, but again, sats don’t encode entropy, they reflect value assigned to state changes. The thermodynamics of Bitcoin are economic and engineered, they are not intrinsic. No physical temperature, no natural law of evolution, but just consensus and constraint.] "UTXOs certainly do not exist spacetime. They build timespace, block by block." [Metaphor accepted, but again, they build a record of chosen action, not spacetime itself. In Hole Universe, spacetime is shaped by structural memory collapse under real Planck strain. UTXOs don’t feel tension.] "Using a temperature-based model derived from Boltzmann (revised by anchoring entropy to a finite supply of internal entropy units), we can calculate the energy of every block precisely. We can take Landauer's Principle and modify the entropy for the proof of work hash function scaled by difficulty." [Interesting thought, but this remains metaphorical at best. You’re mapping Boltzmann to hash entropy, which isn’t physical entropy in any shape or form. SHA-256 is resistant to inversion, not driven by thermal agitation. There’s no physical gas in the Merkle tree :)).] "This defines block energy as resolved entropy per unit work, structurally identical to thermodynamic law but now measurable." [Only by analogy, Block energy isn’t structural entropy, it’s at cost only. Physical entropy is governed by atomic/molecular disorder and field dynamics. Bitcoin energy is chosen as economic burn.] "Space in Bitcoin is not “real estate” it’s resolved possibility. UTXOs define what can be acted upon, and once spent, they mark memory. Their spatiality emerges from time, energy, and memory not independent of them. I am adamant that Bitcoin is the answer to quantum physics." [Resolved possibility, yes, but an answer to quantum physics no. Bitcoin fakes real collapse structure, but cannot perform it. There’s no coherence, no collapse vector, no emergent ontology. Bitcoin is a cultural echo of the Universe's rules, not a mechanism of those rules.] "So yes, we can think of each UTXO as a bit in a curved informational manifold defined by elliptic curve coordinates, time of inclusion, and energy used to confirm it." [I do like that and agree partially. It is a curved ledger memory, but curvature is logical, not geometric. It reflects mathematical choice, not Planck level structure.] "It’s a physical structure made of work by measurement." [Just not, it’s a virtual structure made of abstract work. Bitcoin doesn't move atoms, doesn't collapse quantum states. Its truth is consensus, not cosmic.] "Thank you for input tho, you’re one of the few willing to genuinely explore these questions with me, and I respect that deeply. I will try to get into your paper this weekend." [Total respect in return. These are the exact conversations the world needs, poetic, philosophical and physically grounded, but dude, don't hit me with a text wall because I'm super busy and replying, which I enjoy becomes difficult. Please upload my theory into a clean AI instance of ChatGPT, ask it to read it and fully understand it, then fire away with the questions. My theory acts as a script plug-in giving it better reasoning. I suggest printing to pdf from medium and uploading that, in order to pull in the equations and images. Uploading the pdf on here doesn't seem to ever work for me?] "Whether we say “Bitcoin is a quantum computer,” or “Bitcoin is a mirror of quantum collapse,” the point is the same: it is a governed system of irreversible entropy resolution that anchors time, energy, and memory into conserved, measurable structure." [Agreed mirror is the right word. Let’s not project ontological origins onto engineered artefacts. But yes, Bitcoin shows us that truth arises from irreversibility, proof, collapse and tension. In that sense, it is one of the most important spiritual artefacts of our age.] "No point to argue what is or isn’t a quantum computer; bitcoin exists. Bitcoin doesn’t care about centralized quantum simulations." [Indeed but the Universe does and the real collapse doesn’t happen on a mining rig or off chain Lng.] "Regardless, this deserves far more investigation by Bitcoiners. What if we are all wrong? “Just Money” they say. Let’s keep the conversations flowing." [Yes because even if Bitcoin isn’t a mechanism of physics, it might still be the message of it. Let’s keep reading and talking, just not by text wall :))).]

This explains how the Universe works and how Bitcoin was made to realign our actions with the better probabilities of the Planck level quantum flow. https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/bitcoin-from-the-black-hole-to-the-star-and-back-again-3e9278da3b68

Here's my latest Paper;- "Zerofield — Zero Distance, Zero Time, Zero Memory and Zero Light Mass" The Entire Structure of the Universe & Eternity This Paper provides Proofs directly from my models structure. This theory is able to construct ‘Constants’ from the structure of the theory and show that they can be calculated from first principles and are indeed not constant. As such, this theory, from its structure alone, provides its own proofs that loop back as proof of the reality from and of the structure itself. For example c the Speed of Light Constant and h Planck's Constant are calculated directly from the structure of this theory and are shown to NOT be constant at all. Those are just a few of the delicious delights waiting inside. Enjoy. https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-zero-distance-zero-time-zero-memory-and-zero-light-08d4b58c75ef

Here's my latest Paper;- "Zerofield — Zero Distance, Zero Time, Zero Memory and Zero Light Mass" The Entire Structure of the Universe & Eternity This Paper provides Proofs directly from my models structure. This theory is able to construct ‘Constants’ from the structure of the theory and show that they can be calculated from first principles and are indeed not constant. As such, this theory, from its structure alone, provides its own proofs that loop back as proof of the reality from and of the structure itself. For example c the Speed of Light Constant and h Planck's Constant are calculated directly from the structure of this theory and are shown to NOT be constant at all. Those are just a few of the delicious delights waiting inside. Enjoy. https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-zero-distance-zero-time-zero-memory-and-zero-light-08d4b58c75ef

Here's my latest Paper;- "Zerofield — Zero Distance, Zero Time, Zero Memory and Zero Light Mass" The Entire Structure of the Universe & Eternity This Paper provides Proofs directly from my models structure. This theory is able to construct ‘Constants’ from the structure of the theory and show that they can be calculated from first principles and are indeed not constant. As such, this theory, from its structure alone, provides its own proofs that loop back as proof of the reality from and of the structure itself. For example c the Speed of Light Constant and h Planck's Constant are calculated directly from the structure of this theory and are shown to NOT be constant at all. Those are just a few of the delicious delights waiting inside. Enjoy. https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-zero-distance-zero-time-zero-memory-and-zero-light-08d4b58c75ef

Here's my latest Paper;- "Zerofield — Zero Distance, Zero Time, Zero Memory and Zero Light Mass" The Entire Structure of the Universe & Eternity This Paper provides Proofs directly from my models structure. This theory is able to construct ‘Constants’ from the structure of the theory and show that they can be calculated from first principles and are indeed not constant. As such, this theory, from its structure alone, provides its own proofs that loop back as proof of the reality from and of the structure itself. For example c the Speed of Light Constant and h Planck's Constant are calculated directly from the structure of this theory and are shown to NOT be constant at all. Those are just a few of the delicious delights waiting inside. Enjoy. https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-zero-distance-zero-time-zero-memory-and-zero-light-08d4b58c75ef

It’s an interesting theory and I will continue to push back on “spacetime”. At the end of the day, all theories are approximations, except bitcoin is not an approximation. Nothing about Bitcoin is an approximation, and it has a ledger. Bitcoin also leads us away from a materialistic view of reality to something further grounded. A quantum particle observed in nature is functionally equivalent to a UTXO, except we can’t see the ledger, we live inside of it. We only have approximations. As discussed, 1 Block within Bitcoins network is functionally equivalent to 1 Planck Block of time, each within their own domain. A quantized emergence of time. I’m still trying to understand what causes collapse from t=0 to t=1 Planck time in your model, Bitcoin suggests initial entropy resolution (mining genesis) from outside of the system creates the first record of irreversible memory. All entropy resolution before the emergence of internal consciousness occurs outside the closed system and the memory (particles) is the signature of entropy resolved, thus energy conserved. The speed of Blocks is a maximum of 4MB per Block, akin to light in a vacuum, yet measured in seconds it is 4MB/10min is the ideal speed of information, yet speeds can be seen above and below this rate. At the end of the day, light is just information and energy. Like in your paper, the elliptic curve of Bitcoin addresses is a zero field, no particles (UTXOs exist) and all locations are memory are 0 unless occupied by a bit (1state) when a utxo is present. This is true for each instance Block of time for all addresses where UTXOs are not present. We seem to be very close in theories, but I’m pointing to Bitcoin as the only proof that’s not an approximation. How does your paper define a 1 state? What is 1? What is infinity? What is your point of reference for absolute scarcity? What is Planck Temperature in this theory?

You can push back all you want. My papers fundamental break Paradoxes, prove all Laws are not fundamental Laws, they merely describe the structural properties of my theory, prove the all Constants are not constants and can be calculated from the first principles of my theory, the Light has no Mass, Light Years should never be used as a measurement of distance, Memory and Consciousness is completely written etcetera etc. I have not only created the Construct of the Universe, it's entire lifecycle continuously through "Big Bang" events but also Entropy and Continuous Memory and the Eternity beyond the Universe. So forgive me if I don't engage with your trying to rectify all that to Bitcoin, which I have already done and made public in 2 clearly identifiable papers.

I understand that, but I literally think Bitcoin disproves parts of the theory and disproves the Big Bang (terrible semantics). Bitcoin also breaks all paradoxes. Bitcoin is the only thing that isn’t an approximation. Bitcoin just is. All models are destroyed. I am still trying to understand where Planck temperature fits in to all of this. Bitcoin reveals fundamental error in our understanding of Temperature, thus literally everything.

Bitcoin breaks paradoxes, no, as I have said in my papers, Bitcoin is a mirror of some ofthe Universe's rules. How we understand the Universe and Eternity is way beyond Bitcoin. That is IT, in a nutshell. Have you actually read my papers, because if you had logically you would be questioning different things,

We can agree to disagree. I did start the 80 minute read, but got distracted from that given the 4th of July weekend. I did read the 19 minute paper you just sent before responding. I have thrown the long paper into my AI as you have requested. Bitcoin certainly breaks paradoxes and it exists unchallenged, a simple one being Gödel's to start. Bitcoin is a mirror (or lens) of the universe. It depends on the intention for which you seek. Would we be able to recognize a universe inside of a universe? Universe comes from Latin universum — from unus (“one”) + versus (“turned”). Literally: “all things turned into one.” There is no “one” without absolute scarcity.

Here's my latest Paper how the structure lets energy flow, turns that energy into matter and further memory and echoes through the quantum carriers too. If you've got 18 minutes, it's refined and jam packed full of goodies :)) https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-memory-to-energy-to-mass-to-structure-to-consciousness-amore-631cc20fe181

Here's my latest Paper, this turns nearly everything on it’s head. https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/how-%CF%80-became-god-from-0-3f365a283516