Thanks bro appreciate it.
Yea the truth is that I explicitly try to ground it on what people actually said and not to editorialize. If they make these big Rube Goldberg argument then Jamie's gonna reflect that. And I'd rather have it that way than have globalist retards try to fill the gaps with propaganda.
I would argue the collateral concept is actually a great marriage of internet convenience + good money properties (it was the first thing I thought of).
I'd also argue that agentic payments is awesome. I had been waiting for something like OpenClaw to solve long reasoning chains/orchestration and it finally got good enough to use. The real problem imo is that there aren't enough "things worth buying" with your agent with bitcoin. So this project is me trying to address that.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
Yeah not a knock on your tool I think it's doing its job perfectly. Pretty sick
I guess I've been trying to think more about why bitcoin has any value, is it based on a probability of some end state (ie hyperbicoinization), the economic value it current facilitates in commerce, the current demand for value transfer outside of fiat rails, decentralized gambling, all of this combined? I don't know