Tanks for the clarification. > It does stop people installing another OS You mean "doesn't stop people", right? As stated elsewhere, a law lives on its interpretation, and every interpretation is instrumental. Probabably the article is alarmist and has a clickbait title, following a persomal instrumental interpretation as well, but the fact that Samsung locked its OS few days ago is a suspicious coincidence. The queston is: is it possible that other manufacturers, Google included, use this law to arbitrary decide to lock the bootloafer? It's not a crazy scenario to me, given the absurd things they did in the past. I think that in these cases, always paying attention to don't spread dangerous misinformation (here I don't see harm), is better to take in consideration the worst outcome. If "they" see that we are worried, they will be careful not to exaggerate; if we ignore the matter, they will do whatever suits them.

Replies (4)

Tanks for the feedback. I already replied in the thread explaining my point of view, for example:
daniele's avatar daniele
Tanks for the clarification. > It does stop people installing another OS You mean "doesn't stop people", right? As stated elsewhere, a law lives on its interpretation, and every interpretation is instrumental. Probabably the article is alarmist and has a clickbait title, following a persomal instrumental interpretation as well, but the fact that Samsung locked its OS few days ago is a suspicious coincidence. The queston is: is it possible that other manufacturers, Google included, use this law to arbitrary decide to lock the bootloafer? It's not a crazy scenario to me, given the absurd things they did in the past. I think that in these cases, always paying attention to don't spread dangerous misinformation (here I don't see harm), is better to take in consideration the worst outcome. If "they" see that we are worried, they will be careful not to exaggerate; if we ignore the matter, they will do whatever suits them.
View quoted note →
@daniele > You mean "doesn't stop people", right? Yes, we fixed it in an edit but it's not bridged to Nostr so we posted it again as an reply to ourselves. See this: The same author on the same site essentially admitted their story was nonsense based on AI. They didn't correct/update the original story. It got covered by tons and tons of other sites. They've all moved on to other misinformation cycles.
I defnitly would also rather be save than sorry. Do you have a link to said law? I did not find on a fast search. Defnitly it is important to call out Samsung, when they do not allow bootloader unlock anymore. Agree with this. My concern was only to spread information, that is not based on facts. Because no matter how grave a story is. Only when it is based on true facts, it could be relevant.