You misunderstood things on so many levels, its impressive. Nostr is not a platform, Neither is it (just) for micro blogging, I was not proposing any Nostr content bots.

I was using the term platform to refer to something people can put stuff on for other people to see. A stage is a platform. Twitter is a platform. The interconnected decentralized relays implementing the Nostr protocol are a platform people can put stuff on for other people to see. If you disagree with that usage of the term "platform", could you give a definition that you would prefer? And can you explain what term I should use to refer to something people can put stuff on for other people to see? In your previous post, you advocated tasking agents to pirate and rip content creators and nostrify it. I thought you were telling people to have their bots put the contents of other people's websites on Nostr. Do you think people should have bots post other websites' content or am I misunderstanding whether you want that? I understand that Nostr is both for notes and other stuff too. Would any of the things you want nostrified turn into notes like we use for microblogging? Or would all of the contents of all of the websites end up in the "other stuff" category"?