1) A while back I wrote how Michael Saylor's role in Bitcoin was to: - normalize paper exposure (MSTR), - push "BTC = Store of Value (not Medium of Exchange)" narratives, - refuse to normalize Proof-of-Reserves that would discipline the entire paper stack If Larry Fink was tasked with this job, he'd probably get a lot more pushback. https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-microstrategys-best-days-are 2) Jack Dorsey's role seems to be to normalize permissioned, surveilled "Bitcoin payments" with Square. With Square, every Bitcoin payment generates identity-linked transaction data: buyer, location, device, and amount. All transactions flow through Square/Cash App's KYC/AML perimeter, meaning both sides of the payment are verified. That data fuels risk scoring, fraud models, blacklist propagation, and targeted marketing. So the surveillance value, not the 1% fee, becomes Square's enduring moat. 3) I also wrote about how Bitcoin Core's developers have been attacking Bitcoin's sovereign/MoE use for a very long time now. From the outside look in, Bitcoin Core is a well-oiled machine. There's barely any dissent. It seems they all embrace the "Bitcoin is arbitrary data storage" narrative. They are solving the problem no Bitcoiner knew they had: "How to store your pictures on other people's computers". 4) 99.9% of Bitcoin influencers seem completely captured or delusional. I tried listening to a bunch of different podcasts recently and 5 minutes in, I end up wondering if I'm taking crazy pills or something. So what's the lesson? The lesson is don't trust, and verify. Do your own research and don't be a sheep. People prioritize their own interests, not yours. Some people are corrupt, most are fallible, and some are both.

Replies (10)

Wonderful piece. The store of value narrative only works if there is a fungible currency waiting on the other side. Else it's just a system asset with systemic risk.
Not sure which one you are referring to since I've linked to 3 articles, but my guess is the Bitcoin Core one. The Bitcoin Core one is quickly becoming the most viewed article on my substack so we're slowly but surely spreading the word.
Default avatar
nobody 1 month ago
why would bitcoin be under threat magnum?
I think BTC migrates toward supervised Store-of-Value, with managed cyclicality and paper-dominant flow; self-custody remains a small, high-convexity tail sleeve.