Replies (21)

Only issue is that too many private relays will have an unpleasant effect on the network. I would have less relays but more powerful and persistent ones.
Not everybody is going to run their own relays, more relays is always better as long as you dont have like 1000+ relays to pull from then its fine
i couldn't find an anonymous TURN server (paid or otherwise), so i'm running my own coturn to connect phone to agent over webrtc. it's essentially a nostr relay with higher bandwidth and low latency
Yea we can add more apps, we built a docker compose like structure so its pretty familiar and can run most apps, for now we are limited to apps serving over HTTP only, but on the roadmap we plan to support other generic TCP/UDP services
Not quite, this looks like managed VPS for your own dedicated apps, LNVPS apps are deployed on shared kubernetes cluster
It could be better, but we have the most restrictive permissions we can have for now, but we will continuously review this. Also we only allow installing apps from the catalog so there is very low risk atm. Later we plan to allow running any arbitrary image but we need a few more security layers first.
Sure will let you know, current setup is quite secure but not bullet proof Kimi K3 review: The codebase is unusually well hardened for a multi-tenant app platform โ€” PSS restricted/baseline per namespace, read-only root FS, drop: ALL, capped emptyDir scratch, no SA tokens in tenant pods, encrypted config at rest, fail-closed billing gate
I'm afraid that small relays will give up and just lose data. Infrastructure is a serious stuff.
โ†‘