You started misguiding again without going into nuances.
Chainsplits created by contentious soft forks are not meant to be permanent.
On permanent chainsplits like bcash, sure. Not the case here.
I am not an OG like yourself but as far as I know, never in the history of Bitcoin has any exchange offered old coin and SF coin in the event of a SF. This one will be contentious and it might happen, but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice.
The most frustrating part about your recent tweets/comments related to core vs knots debate (& BIP 444) is 80IQ like myself gets these nuances but you don't.
I think you get the nuances too but since you have become CORECUCK, you just chose to not get into nuances.
Login to reply
Replies (8)
Don't let @ODELL gaslight you plebs.
I can't wait for him to tell me LIAR.
On a side note, he is trying hard to become Luke 2.0 without having BALLS to call out shitcoin core and shitcoin core devs for enabling more spam on bitcoin timechain.
View quoted note →
WATCH WHAT THEY DO, NOT WHAT THEY SAY
Yup
--> "but still one of the coins will die so it doesn't make much sense to offer the choice"
How does it die?
It wont be obvious which one of the chains is *winning* without assigning real work/value to it. Hash rate driven by the market.
It dies by the market deciding which chain is more valuable.
@ODELL is starting to smell bad. Hope I'm wrong
