there is also these people who support bip110 but against XBT and giving this exact reaction. im trying to understand root of their behavior, and only logical explanation for me is, they have separation anxiety like had before at first. - my first reaction was "ok so this is kinda like another fork now...", - then "ok i will support both sides because i dont wanna give up on all the effort we put on the BTC. it would be better if XBT side wins because its cleaner, but it would be smoother if we can recapture BTC back". - then "suitcoin is literally disgusting and they did the first hardfork technically by ignoring bip110 rules. XBT is bitcoin" also price too, effects them, they still deeply wanna see number-go-up. also they dont like the feeling of being have to start again. but what is the alternative? support a literal cbdc? where two big nodes/miners can decide to do any softfork they want? i think these are people who were concerned with spam, but not bitcoin health, or what bitcoin is suppose to be. i mean i always thought: - "hashers can just change pool" (they dont) - "pools listen to the nodes otherwise we invalidate their blocks" (that only works if mining is decentralized already) for short we suddenly became aware that bitcoin had an active 51% attack. some cant see it still, because it was working well before why panic now? BRO its literal CBDC