Keychat's avatar
Keychat 1 year ago
The security of off-chain BTC is not uniform—counterparty risk increases in the following order: Lightning-Channel BTC → Ark BTC → Spark BTC → Liquid BTC → Cashu BTC → Custodial BTC. The Lightning Network is a channel layer plus a routing layer. If you run your own channel, the routing layer lets you settle payments directly. For the other five off-chain wallets, the operator shares its own Lightning channels with users, allowing them to send and receive Lightning payments. Liquid example • Paying — your wallet sends the same amount of L-BTC, and the operator pays the invoice through its channels. • Receiving — the operator first receives BTC over Lightning, then sends you the equivalent L-BTC. Liquid, Spark, and Ark can make users’ sending and receiving of Lightning payments atomic. Lightning is the transport network—other off-chain solutions plug in as special nodes. image

Replies (17)

Keychat's avatar
Keychat 1 year ago
BTC on a centralized exchange.
m00ninite's avatar
m00ninite 1 year ago
An exchange could be a cashu mint, which is strictly an upgrade. I can't imagine the Coinbases of the world deploying such privacy-first technology though. Govts would immediately slap them down.
A cashu mint cannot rug pull you specifically or prevent you from moving your assets. An exchange can do that, per user basis.
Default avatar
Nomad - BIP-110 10 months ago
Mutiny Wallet was the best for privacy. It's a great loss it doesn't exist anymore..
Can you recover your funds in cashu mint if the computer of the mint explode without backup ? For example ? Or have a boat accident ?
Keychat's avatar
Keychat 10 months ago
I think Jimmy meant to emphasize “specifically.” If a mint runs off with the funds, everyone on that mint loses their sats.
Keychat's avatar
Keychat 10 months ago
If the Spark operator is also the previous owner of those funds, the holder faces greater counterparty risk than if they were holding Liquid BTC.