Class-action lawsuits were made for this.
All the big early wins for the environmental movement in the US were class actions against polluters using the (literally medieval) Tort of Nuisance.
Richard Nixon didn't create the EPA in 1972 because he cared about the Spotted Owl. He created the EPA so his Big Polluter buddies could now shield themselves with "I was compliant with regulations at the time" while simultaneously raising paperwork barriers to entry against competitors.
Torts exist to punish the guilty. Regulations exist to shield them (and construct cozy monopolies on the side).
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Thank you. I was not familiar with torts. I do not even know this word in english.
But yes I think there are good examples in the US, where a crowd of individuals can request a reparation for a tort.
I think in Switzerland this is not possible the same way.
https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/collective-redress-class-actions-2025/switzerland
Your government considered adopting Class Actions in 2006, but the bill was defeated :(
Leaving opaque bureaucratic regulators as your only recourse for dispersed harms.
Switzerland, you can get away with this in a low-density all-rural world, but this ain't that world...